Saturday, 12 February 2011

Aircraft build - Under carrage

Tyres
standard primatives - cone - size using reference planes
















Editable poly - edge - loop select both sides - scale - drag inwards

















Turbo smooth

















Select edge - loop - select second loop - scale in


















Wheels

Cylinder - line up geometry with tyre - hide tyre - [height segments 1] [cap segments 3]
















Editable poly - select edge - loop - scale

















Select poly - move geometry backwards - FIND OUT DOESNT WORK - REPEAT PROCESS USING CAP SEGMENTS 5

















Repeat process - next slide showing intended result with materials + turbo smooth + attached to tyre

















Tools - mirror - offset 1.0 - y axis - instance (so changes apply to both)

















Cylinder to bridge gap - attach

















Tools - mirror - add cylinder to bridge gap


Copy - instance















Extend undercarriage support arm up to fuselage. Select polygon that would intersect. 
















Extrude - inset - move polygons back into fuselage leaving square tube.

















 Remove front / rear sides of tube. Bridge gaps in remaining tube sections. Extend undercarriage arm up into fuselage


















Reposition rear gears to mimic 747 positions. Begin enhancing appearance. Support leg change from single cylinder to larger diameter on top of smaller diameter cylinder (raise cylinder - select bottom polygon - inset - extrude) - create clones and rescale + position to create more realistic appearance

















Select polygons where undercarriage doors would be - this will allow a reference point when flicking between vertex + polygons because selections are saved

















Manipulate vertex to create more accurate door profile.



















Detach - extrude for thickness


















Rotate into position



1 comment:

  1. Response to the work on Richard Jones Blog by Stewart Pullen


    I think that Richard has organised the modelling of a complex structure,such as this aircraft, in a very clever way. He has broken the aircraft into component parts which has made the modelling process more manageable, rather than trying to model a complete aircraft structure. Modelling a structure in this way probably ultimately cuts down on the overall time required, as each component part is modelled on an individual basis and then brought together to realise the final 3d model.

    ReplyDelete